From the request to the underlying need
A request suggests a solution. Research identifies the outcome customers need and the context in which it matters.
The next step in product development may call for focus, not additional features. Compare relevant customer needs before committing development and maintenance resources, to find where capacity can create the most value.
For CPOs, Product Managers, CTOs and SaaS companies.

Companies served by George Eich
Institutions and startup programs
While switching platforms, the team used customer needs to decide which features to include and which to defer.
The team used customer evidence to decide when to strengthen its core product and when to expand its offering.
“We gained a more strategic view of the product and were able to prioritize the roadmap and the company’s positioning.”Feedback shared with the Institute · English translation
The backlog grows and the team delivers, yet improvements that matter to customers may still be delayed. Every less relevant request takes capacity away from something that could better address essential needs.
“Which improvement would matter most to customers?”
“Podemos concentrar esforço nas entregas certas.”
“We still need to solve this better.”
“Where is the highest potential return?”
A more focused roadmap can strengthen the value proposition and free capacity. Start by identifying needs that are shared and still poorly met.
Da decisão à geração e captura de valor
A need may exist without justifying strategic priority. Research tests relevance, while leadership also considers capacity, feasibility and economic returns.
The team absorbs more commitments than it can sustain without displacing important work.
Competing initiatives keep changing the sequence and expectations around delivery.
Urgent requests enter the plan without a sufficiently clear connection to relevant product value.
The Value Matrix guides decisions across three horizons: strengthen Core Business, expand through Expansion and create through Innovation. The Study supplies evidence, while value creation, capture and ROI also depend on economic conditions and execution.
In The Need Gap 2026 sample, 80.32% of needs were prioritized by fewer than 30% of customers within their respective bases. This reach measure must be interpreted alongside other evidence when choosing where to focus development and investment.
The study covered 1,423 needs across 59 companies. In 1,143 cases (80.32%), reach was below 30% of customers in their respective bases.
Fonte: The Need Gap 2026, estudo de George Eich.
I want to find the prioritiesWhen many requests compete for the same capacity, a product may grow in features without delivering proportional progress for the customers who matter most to the business.
Relevant problems continue to affect the experience of existing customers.
Melhorias com potencial de ampliar uso e receita disputam espaço com pedidos menores.
Every delivery increases maintenance obligations and reduces capacity for the next opportunity.
An executive interpretation that connects evidence to the decision your leadership needs to make. The deliverables reflect the agreed business context and scope.
A request suggests a solution. Research identifies the outcome customers need and the context in which it matters.
Quantitative selection reveals who shares the priority; ICAN measures perceived need fulfillment.
An updateable evidence base guides the roadmap. Feasibility, complexity and opportunities for value capture complete the choice.
Tell us what your company needs to decide.
An executive review of opportunities that deserve to move forward and choices that should wait.
Direction toward improvements combining customer relevance and business potential.
Evidence for discussing benefits, expected returns and required capacity.
Recommendations on what to advance, investigate, defer or reconsider in the roadmap.
As entregas específicas são definidas conforme a decisão e o escopo contratado.
When the team needs to focus on improvements with the highest potential.
When recurring problems persist despite new deliveries.
When leadership seeks opportunities to expand usage, revenue or margin.
When the team needs focus to improve what is already relevant.
The engagement identifies relevant customer needs and connects them with product decisions. We assess reach, expected benefits, delivery capacity and economic potential to guide what advances, waits or requires reconsideration.
Connect customer benefits with potential effects on retention, revenue expansion or margin. Then consider investment, maintenance costs and assumptions that require validation. Prioritization guides this analysis without promising guaranteed returns.
Priority guidance is built around business context. Estimates, dependencies and schedules are reviewed with the responsible team to turn direction into a feasible plan.
Executive analysis of priorities, the reasoning behind choices and recommendations for the development agenda. Specific deliverables depend on the decision and agreed scope.
The typical reference is three to six weeks for structured research and executive analysis, depending on scope, information access and participant availability.
You describe the product, decision and competing deliverables. The conversation helps us understand the context and define how the Institute can contribute and what scope makes sense.
Bring your product opportunities. We will discuss where to focus development to improve customer outcomes and business returns.
I want to find the prioritiesRequest a conversation with the George Eich Institute.
NEXT DECISION
Briefly describe the decision, investment or challenge you need to assess. We will follow up to understand your needs and agree on an appropriate scope.
Preview mode. No data will be sent.
We will contact you to discuss your decision and next steps.