From the request to the underlying need
A request suggests a solution. Research identifies the outcome customers need and the context in which it matters.
The request is legitimate. But does it deserve the product team's development capacity?
A customer's request may be legitimate without justifying a priority for the entire product. The decision is what deserves development now, considering need relevance, impact on the target audience and available capacity.
For CPOs, Product Managers, CTOs and SaaS companies.

Companies served by George Eich
Institutions and startup programs
While switching platforms, the team used customer needs to decide which features to include and which to defer.
The team used customer evidence to decide when to strengthen its core product and when to expand its offering.
“We gained a more strategic view of the product and were able to prioritize the roadmap and the company’s positioning.”Feedback shared with the Institute · English translation
The customer asks. Sales reinforces the request. The team starts discussing deadlines. But three questions remain: how many customers need it, what benefit would they receive and would they pay for it?
“This is important to us.”
“We need to meet this request.”
“Does this matter to our customer base?”
“Is it worth the investment and maintenance?”
A need may be real for one customer without justifying investment across the ICP. Decisions require a view of the customer base and the economic outcome.
Da decisão à geração e captura de valor
A need may exist without justifying strategic priority. Research tests relevance, while leadership also considers capacity, feasibility and economic returns.
The team absorbs more commitments than it can sustain without displacing important work.
Competing initiatives keep changing the sequence and expectations around delivery.
Urgent requests enter the plan without a sufficiently clear connection to relevant product value.
The Value Matrix guides decisions across three horizons: strengthen Core Business, expand through Expansion and create through Innovation. The Study supplies evidence, while value creation, capture and ROI also depend on economic conditions and execution.
The Need Gap 2026 analyzed 1,423 needs. Of these, 1,143 were selected by fewer than 30% of customers. This helps explain why collecting requests is only the beginning of the decision.
A different finding: 528 needs (37.10%) received no selection at the quantitative stage. These two measures are different and must not be added. Research across 59 companies.
Fonte: The Need Gap 2026, estudo de George Eich.
I want evidence-based prioritiesTreating one-off requests as if they represented the entire customer base can fragment a product and create difficult maintenance obligations.
Features accumulate for increasingly diverse audiences and use cases.
Melhorias compartilhadas esperam enquanto pedidos isolados avançam.
A entrega entra no roadmap sem clareza sobre receita, margem e manutenção.
An executive interpretation that connects evidence to the decision your leadership needs to make. The deliverables reflect the agreed business context and scope.
A request suggests a solution. Research identifies the outcome customers need and the context in which it matters.
Quantitative selection reveals who shares the priority; ICAN measures perceived need fulfillment.
An updateable evidence base guides the roadmap. Feasibility, complexity and opportunities for value capture complete the choice.
Tell us what your company needs to decide.
Executive analysis to support decisions across product, engineering, sales and leadership.
Direction on which needs justify concentrating available capacity.
A rationale for deferring or investigating requests before promising delivery.
Recommendations for discussing new requests based on relevance and returns.
As entregas específicas são definidas conforme a decisão e o escopo contratado.
Before turning a negotiation into a permanent product commitment.
When shared criteria are missing from decisions about competing requests.
When the list grows but the team does not know what deserves to move forward.
When you need to evaluate how broadly a request matters to customers.
The engagement identifies relevant customer needs and connects them with product decisions. We assess reach, expected benefits, delivery capacity and economic potential to guide what advances, waits or requires reconsideration.
Evaluate this customer's strategic and economic importance, the expected benefits and the cost of developing and maintaining the solution. A single request can justify investment when the choice is deliberate rather than automatically treated as a general priority.
Priority guidance is built around business context. Estimates, dependencies and schedules are reviewed with the responsible team to turn direction into a feasible plan.
Executive analysis of priorities, the reasoning behind choices and recommendations for the development agenda. Specific deliverables depend on the decision and agreed scope.
The typical reference is three to six weeks for structured research and executive analysis, depending on scope, information access and participant availability.
You describe the product, decision and competing deliverables. The conversation helps us understand the context and define how the Institute can contribute and what scope makes sense.
Bring the requests competing for the next cycle. We will discuss how to separate one-off requests from priorities that justify investment.
I want evidence-based prioritiesRequest a conversation with the George Eich Institute.
NEXT DECISION
Briefly describe the decision, investment or challenge you need to assess. We will follow up to understand your needs and agree on an appropriate scope.
Preview mode. No data will be sent.
We will contact you to discuss your decision and next steps.