Which opportunities should advance
Identify ideas and opportunities whose relevance justifies concentrated resources.
Choose which ideas and opportunities deserve resources before expanding the innovation portfolio.
George Eich Institute helps your leadership give innovation a clear focus and decide what should advance, be validated or stay outside the current investment agenda.
For CEOs, innovation leaders and strategy teams.
The company collects ideas, explores technologies and runs experiments. Sponsors defend different opportunities. Some initiatives continue because they have already started, while others wait for attention. There is activity, but no clear view of what deserves the next investment.
“Which ideas should we pursue first?”
“What justifies allocating more resources?”
“Should this experiment continue?”
“How does this opportunity connect to the business?”
An attractive idea is not yet a priority. The company needs to decide which opportunities justify resources and which assumptions must be tested before making a larger commitment.
The risk is committing capital, people and technology to priorities that add effort and complexity without increasing the company's ability to create and capture value.
Initiatives keep consuming attention while the company has not resolved what should advance or stop.
Resources follow novelty or sponsor influence instead of a clearly supported business opportunity.
The initiatives that deserve validation compete for capacity with experiments that no longer justify attention.
Our innovation prioritization consulting connects relevant market needs with the company's context. Leadership receives guidance on which opportunities should advance, which require validation and which should remain outside the current investment agenda.
Identify ideas and opportunities whose relevance justifies concentrated resources.
Clarify the questions that need answers before a larger investment is considered.
Review experiments and opportunities that do not justify competing for current capacity.
Bring the decision your company needs to make.
An executive interpretation that connects evidence to the decision your leadership needs to make. The deliverables reflect the agreed business context and scope.
The opportunities that deserve attention and investment in the current business context.
The reasons supporting the choices and the assumptions that need further investigation.
What to advance, validate, review, defer or remove from the current agenda.
Specific deliverables are defined according to the decision and the agreed scope.
When the company has several innovation initiatives without a clear continuation decision.
When ideas compete for funding and leadership needs to choose where to invest.
When multiple possibilities look attractive but cannot all receive attention.
When the portfolio has expanded without a clear connection to relevant market needs.
It is the decision about which ideas and opportunities deserve company resources. It clarifies what should advance, what needs validation and what should wait or leave the current innovation agenda.
Yes. Ongoing experiments and new opportunities can be considered together to guide continuation, further validation, deferral or removal from the portfolio.
No. The focus is the choice of priorities and investment direction. Developing solutions and managing experiments are subsequent activities defined according to the scope.
An executive interpretation connecting the evidence to the decision your leadership needs to make. Direction for innovation priorities: The opportunities that deserve attention and investment in the current business context. Evidence and validation questions: The reasons supporting the choices and the assumptions that need further investigation. Guidance for the innovation portfolio: What to advance, validate, review, defer or remove from the current agenda. Specific deliverables are defined according to the decision and the agreed scope.
The reference is 3 to 6 weeks for structured research and executive analysis, depending on the scope. Timing depends on the decision, access to information and participant availability. The first conversation helps assess the appropriate format.
Tell us which ideas and experiments are competing for resources. We will assess how to help your leadership choose the next focus.
Help me prioritize innovationStart a conversation with George Eich Institute on WhatsApp.